http://blog.stchur.com/2007/07/06/avoiding-recursion-in-javascript/ If you don't expect too much from me, you might not be let down. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:23:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://blog.stchur.com/2007/07/06/avoiding-recursion-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-131929 Andreas Frische Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:25:18 +0000 http://stchur.com/blog2/2007/07/06/avoiding-recursion-in-javascript/#comment-131929 You can have your cake and eat it too. Use Tail Recursion and you will only have one call to your function at once. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tail_call You can have your cake and eat it too. Use Tail Recursion and you will only have one call to your function at once.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tail_call

]]> http://blog.stchur.com/2007/07/06/avoiding-recursion-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-10185 sstchur Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:47:45 +0000 http://stchur.com/blog2/2007/07/06/avoiding-recursion-in-javascript/#comment-10185 Thanks Jared! Not at all a bad idea. Maybe for a future post. Thanks Jared! Not at all a bad idea. Maybe for a future post.

]]> http://blog.stchur.com/2007/07/06/avoiding-recursion-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-10182 jared Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:32:04 +0000 http://stchur.com/blog2/2007/07/06/avoiding-recursion-in-javascript/#comment-10182 How about publishing the code, so other people can verify the speed change for themselves? How about testing recursion speed in the newer js parsers? I think it would be a really interesting to what you've already posted. How about publishing the code, so other people can verify the speed change for themselves? How about testing recursion speed in the newer js parsers? I think it would be a really interesting to what you've already posted.

]]>